Three key misconceptions in the debate about AI and existential risk July 15, 2024
Jack Kelly, AI Research Fellow at PSR | Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Arguing about the relative importance of existential threats ignores the fundamental truth that any credible existential threat is one too many and that all must be engaged in parallel. If you accept that AI might pose an existential threat, then it should be a societal priority to address this threat, even if you are more concerned about another issue.
More Campaign Update
Florida’s ‘medical freedom’ bill takes another step forward in Senate
WUSF “As a doctor on the front lines, I'm seeing less and less of my patients get vaccines they need,” said Dr. Ron Saff, an...
Repeal of EPA ‘endangerment finding’ endangers human health
Mark Vossler, MD, Washington PSR, and Howard Frumkin, MD | Seattle Times Washingtonians are not immune to these threats. We have experienced flooding, accelerating wildfires...
PSR Concludes First Nuclear Weapons and Radiation: Health Risks and Advocacy Course!
From November 3, 2025 to February 2, 2026, PSR, in coordination with the Generational Radiation Impact Project, successfully launched and concluded our eleven week Nuclear...