Three key misconceptions in the debate about AI and existential risk July 15, 2024
Jack Kelly, AI Research Fellow at PSR | Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Arguing about the relative importance of existential threats ignores the fundamental truth that any credible existential threat is one too many and that all must be engaged in parallel. If you accept that AI might pose an existential threat, then it should be a societal priority to address this threat, even if you are more concerned about another issue.
More Campaign Update
Teaching Patients Climate Resilience
from My Green Doctor New research shows that healthcare professionals have a unique opportunity to teach their patients about individual and community climate resilience.Ā My Green...
Protests in Kansas City Demanding a Halt to Nuclear Weapons Production and the U.S. Arms RaceĀ
By Ann Suellentrop, MSRN On May 19, 2025 six resisters to nuclear weapons production in Kansas City crossed the purple property line at the National...
Young Health Professionals and Students Engage in Nuclear Weapons AbolitionĀ
This May, PSRās Nuclear Weapons Abolition Program has been busy engaging young health professionals and students around the work of nuclear disarmament. From campus socials...