The pragmatist’s guide to nuclear disarmament February 9, 2024
Steve Olson, WPSR Member, The Seattle Times
But couldn’t at least part of our defense funding be spent in more socially productive ways? After all, flying a nuclear bomb-carrying F-35A jet for two hours costs as much as a nurse makes in a year. Keeping more than 55,000 mostly young men and women here in Washington well-trained and outfitted for future conflicts may help us feel more secure. But it doesn’t build infrastructure, spark innovation, or improve the health and well-being of the population at large.
Here, the Washington Against Nuclear Weapons coalition, led by the Washington chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility, has been exerting pressure on our representatives and senators to take a stand against nuclear weapons.
More In the News
Florida’s ‘medical freedom’ bill takes another step forward in Senate
WUSF “As a doctor on the front lines, I'm seeing less and less of my patients get vaccines they need,” said Dr. Ron Saff, an...
Repeal of EPA ‘endangerment finding’ endangers human health
Mark Vossler, MD, Washington PSR, and Howard Frumkin, MD | Seattle Times Washingtonians are not immune to these threats. We have experienced flooding, accelerating wildfires...
Removing the EPA Endangerment Finding hurts us
Pam McVety, PSR Florida Board Member | Tallahassee Democrat Then there is the extreme heat we experience way too often. Last summer Tallahassee experienced record-breaking...