Federal judge demands Trump administration reveal how its drilling plans will fuel climate change March 20, 2019

The Washington Post

The initial ruling in the case, brought by the advocacy groups WildEarth Guardians and Physicians for Social Responsibility, has implications for oil and gas drilling on federal land throughout the West. In the decision, Contreras — an Obama appointee — faulted the agency’s environmental assessments as inadequate because they did not detail how individual drilling projects contribute to the nation’s overall carbon output. Since greenhouse gas emissions are driving climate change, the judge wrote, these analyses did not provide policymakers and the public with a sufficient understanding of drilling’s impact, as required under the National Environmental Policy Act.

Read more

More In the News

Gas-powered building equipment fuels poses serious public health risks

Oregon Capital Chronicle Implementing healthy air standards would significantly improve air quality across Oregon, reducing asthma and other pollution-related health issues and decrease health care...
More about Gas-powered building equipment fuels poses serious public health risks

Eric Hayot and Ned Ketyer: TIAA’s ‘sportswashing’ its contribution to climate change

Net Ketyer, MD, PSR Pennsylvania President and Eric Hayot, Penn State | Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Here in Pennsylvania, where burning coal and natural gas contributes to...
More about Eric Hayot and Ned Ketyer: TIAA’s ‘sportswashing’ its contribution to climate change

Countering Propaganda From the Fossil Fuel Industry

Linda Rudolph, MD, former PSR board member | The New York Times Most Americans — including our policymakers — are unaware that burning fossil fuels...
More about Countering Propaganda From the Fossil Fuel Industry