Federal judge demands Trump administration reveal how its drilling plans will fuel climate change March 20, 2019
Photo: WildEarth Guardians / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
The Washington Post
The initial ruling in the case, brought by the advocacy groups WildEarth Guardians and Physicians for Social Responsibility, has implications for oil and gas drilling on federal land throughout the West. In the decision, Contreras — an Obama appointee — faulted the agency’s environmental assessments as inadequate because they did not detail how individual drilling projects contribute to the nation’s overall carbon output. Since greenhouse gas emissions are driving climate change, the judge wrote, these analyses did not provide policymakers and the public with a sufficient understanding of drilling’s impact, as required under the National Environmental Policy Act.
Share:
Categories:
More In the News
Thousands Rally at Baltimore’s War Memorial Plaza for ‘No Kings’ Day
Chesapeake PSR's Drs. Terry Fitzgerald and Gwen DuBois in Washington, DC in October 2025 The Greyhound The concerns on display stretched well beyond immigration. Terry...
Tax Day Realities: Nuclear Weapons and Our Dangerous, Misguided Priorities
Op-ed by PSR Los Angeles Board Member Dr. Robert Dodge | Common Dreams These expenditures rob our communities of precious resources that could be redirected...
The Nuclear Industry Won’t Lower Your Electricity Bill
Michael Rincon, Research & Policy Manager for PSR–Los Angeles; and Haakon Williams, Committee to Bridge the Gap | Los Angeles Sentinel The cost of living...