Federal judge demands Trump administration reveal how its drilling plans will fuel climate change March 20, 2019
Photo: WildEarth Guardians / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
The Washington Post
The initial ruling in the case, brought by the advocacy groups WildEarth Guardians and Physicians for Social Responsibility, has implications for oil and gas drilling on federal land throughout the West. In the decision, Contreras — an Obama appointee — faulted the agency’s environmental assessments as inadequate because they did not detail how individual drilling projects contribute to the nation’s overall carbon output. Since greenhouse gas emissions are driving climate change, the judge wrote, these analyses did not provide policymakers and the public with a sufficient understanding of drilling’s impact, as required under the National Environmental Policy Act.
Share:
Categories:
More In the News
Meet three therapists who are helping Marylanders cope with their climate anxiety
Maryland Matters Van Susteren asserts that the number of people suffering from climate anxiety is “impossible to quantify.” But she and some colleagues attempted to...
Hydrogen for heating is gaining steam. Is it safe?
E&E News Similarly, Physicians for Social Responsibility said heating homes with hydrogen is a prime example where more efficient and less expensive solutions already exist:...
Stop open burning of sugar cane fields in Palm Beach County
Photo: Lisa Jacobs / CC BY-ND 2.0 Howard Kessler, MD, President of PSR Florida | The Palm Beach Post The inhalation of pollutants from these...