Federal judge demands Trump administration reveal how its drilling plans will fuel climate change March 20, 2019
Photo: WildEarth Guardians / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
The Washington Post
The initial ruling in the case, brought by the advocacy groups WildEarth Guardians and Physicians for Social Responsibility, has implications for oil and gas drilling on federal land throughout the West. In the decision, Contreras — an Obama appointee — faulted the agency’s environmental assessments as inadequate because they did not detail how individual drilling projects contribute to the nation’s overall carbon output. Since greenhouse gas emissions are driving climate change, the judge wrote, these analyses did not provide policymakers and the public with a sufficient understanding of drilling’s impact, as required under the National Environmental Policy Act.
Share:
Categories:
More In the News
Colorado River pact isn’t much of a solution. What L.A. must do to save the river
Daniela Morales, PSR Next Gen Climate Ambassador | The Los Angeles Times This “big win” only delays a sustainable solution, endangering the public health of...
New tri-state co-op strives to shed light on solar
Observer-Reporter “Historically, fossil fuel infrastructure has harmed impacted community members and their environments,” said Linnea Bond, health educator and campaign coordinator for [PSR Pennsylvania]. “We...
“Forever chemicals” in fracking
Santa Fe Reporter A new report compiled by Physicians for Social Responsibility has identified the use of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances, known as PFAS, or “forever chemicals,” in 260 of oil and...