Federal judge demands Trump administration reveal how its drilling plans will fuel climate change March 20, 2019
Photo: WildEarth Guardians / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
The Washington Post
The initial ruling in the case, brought by the advocacy groups WildEarth Guardians and Physicians for Social Responsibility, has implications for oil and gas drilling on federal land throughout the West. In the decision, Contreras — an Obama appointee — faulted the agency’s environmental assessments as inadequate because they did not detail how individual drilling projects contribute to the nation’s overall carbon output. Since greenhouse gas emissions are driving climate change, the judge wrote, these analyses did not provide policymakers and the public with a sufficient understanding of drilling’s impact, as required under the National Environmental Policy Act.
Share:
Categories:
More In the News
New Mexico’s fracking water contains cancer-causing chemicals, study says
Photo: WildEarth Guardians / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Santa Fe New Mexican New Mexico fossil fuel companies are using cancer-causing chemicals to aid in their fracking...
Thousands of Americans call for safeguards from gas stove health risks, as public health organizations mark World Asthma Day
Yahoo! News "Asthma is a serious, chronic health condition that can be deadly," noted Barbara Gottlieb, director of the environment and health program, Physicians for...
Earth Day 2023 – Investing in Our Planet
Robert Dodge, MD, PSR Board Member and PSR-Los Angeles President | Common Dreams Today is Earth Day. “Invest in our Planet“ is this year’s theme....