Federal judge demands Trump administration reveal how its drilling plans will fuel climate change March 20, 2019

The Washington Post

The initial ruling in the case, brought by the advocacy groups WildEarth Guardians and Physicians for Social Responsibility, has implications for oil and gas drilling on federal land throughout the West. In the decision, Contreras — an Obama appointee — faulted the agency’s environmental assessments as inadequate because they did not detail how individual drilling projects contribute to the nation’s overall carbon output. Since greenhouse gas emissions are driving climate change, the judge wrote, these analyses did not provide policymakers and the public with a sufficient understanding of drilling’s impact, as required under the National Environmental Policy Act.

Read more

More In the News

Doomsday Clock moves closer to midnight

Dr. Maureen McCue, Board Chair, PSR Iowa | Iowa City Press-Citizen The Doomsday Clock warns of the peril if we continue along the current path....
More

Misinformation on gas stoves is swirling around the internet. Here’s what you need to know

Robert M. Gould, MD, San Francisco Bay PSR | San Francisco Chronicle Overnight, gas stoves have become the latest flashpoint in America’s culture war —...
More

Living with a gas stove? Tips for minimizing health risks

KNKX Public Radio It’s now well established that living with a gas stove can cause a range of health problems that include asthma, heart disease...
More