Federal judge demands Trump administration reveal how its drilling plans will fuel climate change March 20, 2019

The Washington Post

The initial ruling in the case, brought by the advocacy groups WildEarth Guardians and Physicians for Social Responsibility, has implications for oil and gas drilling on federal land throughout the West. In the decision, Contreras — an Obama appointee — faulted the agency’s environmental assessments as inadequate because they did not detail how individual drilling projects contribute to the nation’s overall carbon output. Since greenhouse gas emissions are driving climate change, the judge wrote, these analyses did not provide policymakers and the public with a sufficient understanding of drilling’s impact, as required under the National Environmental Policy Act.

Read more

More In the News

Climate Change and the Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases in the United States

Regina LaRocque, MD, MPH, et. al. | Clinical Infectious Diseases AbstractThe earth is rapidly warming, driven by increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide and other gases that...
More

Ongoing nuclear gamble in Ukraine

Photo: IAEA | CC BY 2.0 Robert Dodge, MD, PSR Board Member | The Hill We recently marked six months since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine;...
More

Iran nuclear agreement is essential

Gwen DuBois, MD, MPH, Chesapeake PSR President | Baltimore Sun [Bret Stephens says] we must not show “weakness” — as if this were a tennis...
More