Federal judge demands Trump administration reveal how its drilling plans will fuel climate change March 20, 2019
Photo: WildEarth Guardians / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
The Washington Post
The initial ruling in the case, brought by the advocacy groups WildEarth Guardians and Physicians for Social Responsibility, has implications for oil and gas drilling on federal land throughout the West. In the decision, Contreras — an Obama appointee — faulted the agency’s environmental assessments as inadequate because they did not detail how individual drilling projects contribute to the nation’s overall carbon output. Since greenhouse gas emissions are driving climate change, the judge wrote, these analyses did not provide policymakers and the public with a sufficient understanding of drilling’s impact, as required under the National Environmental Policy Act.
Share:
Categories:
More In the News
On Earth Day, protesters call on Mayor Parker to denounce PGW and gas lobby efforts to upend green energy
WHYY News “As a PGW customer, and as a physician who cares about the climate, I’m really pissed that we are actually spending my rate...
Clearing the Smoke on Fossil Fuels — The Health Imperative for a Countermarketing Campaign
Linda Rudolph, MD, MPH, and Vishnu Laalitha Surapaneni, MD, MPH | New England Journal of Medicine As the fossil-fuel industry continues to obstruct efforts to...
Lawmakers revive bill to address the dangers of popular kitchen appliances: ‘These things can kill you’
The Cool Down Dr. Kathleen Nolan, a pediatrician and the president of the New York chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility, added, "The gas stove...